<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FLUSH BUFFERS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flushbuffers.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flushbuffers.com</link>
	<description>Commentary on 4th Dimension development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Où est le chien? by Michael Kaye</title>
		<link>http://flushbuffers.com/2010/08/07/ou-est-le-chien/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flushbuffers.com/?p=101#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Nice to finally here the full story. Bonjour François!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to finally here the full story. Bonjour François!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4D DEVCON 1994 Notes by Jake Niimi</title>
		<link>http://flushbuffers.com/2010/08/01/4d-devcon-1994-notes/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Niimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flushbuffers.com/?p=85#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Why did you remove my post... My post was actually useful unlike most of these comments. Ill post it again. Hiya , I spottet a fantastic way to make lots and lots of money online writing blogs. I expect this is probably for the website admin but there are probably more bloggers reading this. I have already made thousands using the techniques described in the product and it&#039;s only been two months. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/2a86mfb/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Free Money Making Blog By Blogging To The Bank&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you remove my post&#8230; My post was actually useful unlike most of these comments. Ill post it again. Hiya , I spottet a fantastic way to make lots and lots of money online writing blogs. I expect this is probably for the website admin but there are probably more bloggers reading this. I have already made thousands using the techniques described in the product and it&#8217;s only been two months. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2a86mfb/" rel="nofollow">Free Money Making Blog By Blogging To The Bank</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NUG Traffic Uptick by Michael Larue</title>
		<link>http://flushbuffers.com/2010/04/29/nug-traffic-uptick/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flushbuffers.com/?p=54#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi Bryan,

&gt; I attribute the uptick to improved developer confidence

Another interpretation...

The NUG is mainly used to discuss issues and problems you need help solving. The general decline in message volume prior to v.11 might indicate that version 2004 was mature and stable, and that most people could resolve their issues referring to previous messages (and that they had fewer problems as well).

The uptick in messages since v.11 probably indicate the many problems in v.11 that users need help with. But the graph continues to increase; that&#039;s not a good sign. If v.11 were more stable, the message volume should be declining now that it&#039;s been out for several years.

&gt; One of the best indicators of a development community’s health is its internal
&gt; communication: more talk means more health; less talk means less health

An unscientific glance at the graph seems to indicate there was more talk on the left side (version 2004) than on the right (v.11).

Anyway, thanks for posting this; your observations do make an interesting discussion point! I certainly do hope the developer community is growing...

Cheers!

Michael Larue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bryan,</p>
<p>&gt; I attribute the uptick to improved developer confidence</p>
<p>Another interpretation&#8230;</p>
<p>The NUG is mainly used to discuss issues and problems you need help solving. The general decline in message volume prior to v.11 might indicate that version 2004 was mature and stable, and that most people could resolve their issues referring to previous messages (and that they had fewer problems as well).</p>
<p>The uptick in messages since v.11 probably indicate the many problems in v.11 that users need help with. But the graph continues to increase; that&#8217;s not a good sign. If v.11 were more stable, the message volume should be declining now that it&#8217;s been out for several years.</p>
<p>&gt; One of the best indicators of a development community’s health is its internal<br />
&gt; communication: more talk means more health; less talk means less health</p>
<p>An unscientific glance at the graph seems to indicate there was more talk on the left side (version 2004) than on the right (v.11).</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for posting this; your observations do make an interesting discussion point! I certainly do hope the developer community is growing&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>Michael Larue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
